Author | Message |
---|
KickerRex Advanced Contributor
Number of posts : 2063 Age : 35 Location : Clarksdale, MS Registration date : 2008-03-05
| Subject: Re: Lets Discuss rationaly some of the things up on board RULES Fri Nov 27, 2009 4:39 pm | |
| i'm not confused.. I just think we are on different pages.. I see exactly what you are saying.. I gave the idea of lowering the ratings to make it cheaper to comepete is all.. I don't think we should do clamped pwr over here.. There's already a place for that over at MWSPL.. Not tryin to stir Dung Pile up, just offering suggestions.. | |
|
| |
sanman I own this joint!
Number of posts : 12087 Age : 52 Location : shelbyville Registration date : 2007-06-23
| Subject: Re: Lets Discuss rationaly some of the things up on board RULES Fri Nov 27, 2009 4:50 pm | |
| OK I HEAR UT I HAVE 1 MORE EXAMPLE
MY S10=3 15'S/24 BATTS(16V)/58K WATTS 164.2
MARK BRUSS S10=4 15'S/20 BATTS(12V)/AROUND 40K WATTS 164.8
AMPLIFIERS AND POWER ARE NOT WHATS KEEPING PEOPLES NUMBERS DOWN THE LACK OF KNOWLEDGE/TESTING/ AND THE WILLINGNESS TO BE TOTALLY DEDICATED TO A COMMON GOAL IS | |
|
| |
KickerRex Advanced Contributor
Number of posts : 2063 Age : 35 Location : Clarksdale, MS Registration date : 2008-03-05
| Subject: Re: Lets Discuss rationaly some of the things up on board RULES Fri Nov 27, 2009 5:10 pm | |
| I don't think you get what I'm sayin.. The clamp pwr issue is for competition to become "more fair" and cheaper.. My opinion is that USACi doesn't need to to go to clamp power bc they have made their name with 4 ohm ratings, and outlaw style.. I simply suggested a rating change.. With the rating change, the pwr will go down the numbers will come of a little bit, its more affordable.. That's all I'm sayin Jeff.. i see your points and I agree for the most part.. I'm not trying to get everyone riled up, its just a suggestion.. That is all.. | |
|
| |
sanman I own this joint!
Number of posts : 12087 Age : 52 Location : shelbyville Registration date : 2007-06-23
| Subject: Re: Lets Discuss rationaly some of the things up on board RULES Fri Nov 27, 2009 5:14 pm | |
| THOSE THAT CALL FOR CHANGE ARE THE FIRST ONES TO BACK OUT EVERY TIME | |
|
| |
KickerRex Advanced Contributor
Number of posts : 2063 Age : 35 Location : Clarksdale, MS Registration date : 2008-03-05
| Subject: Re: Lets Discuss rationaly some of the things up on board RULES Fri Nov 27, 2009 5:25 pm | |
| I am not the one calling for change.. I read all this pissin and crying on the forum from ppl and I offer a solution for the madness.. I hope your comment wasn't directed at me.. | |
|
| |
sanman I own this joint!
Number of posts : 12087 Age : 52 Location : shelbyville Registration date : 2007-06-23
| Subject: Re: Lets Discuss rationaly some of the things up on board RULES Fri Nov 27, 2009 5:33 pm | |
| IT WASNT BUT IF IT WAS WHAT CAN YA REALLY DO I HAVE READ YOU SAY NO CLAMP BUT HAVE YOU SAID WHAT YOU PROPOSE TO CHANGE TO MAKE IT (FAIR) OR (CHEAPER) | |
|
| |
KickerRex Advanced Contributor
Number of posts : 2063 Age : 35 Location : Clarksdale, MS Registration date : 2008-03-05
| Subject: Re: Lets Discuss rationaly some of the things up on board RULES Fri Nov 27, 2009 5:42 pm | |
| i proposed changin the ratings from 4ohm to 2ohm or from 4ohm to 1ohm.. either or.. All in all this really doesn't effect me bc I play in SB.. BUT with that said if I ran prostock or mod right now and they changed it to clamped pwr, I would be HIGHLY pissed.. I'm trying to help out.. The rule I suggested in no way shape form or fashion benifits me.. Just tryin to put other ideas in ppls heads.. | |
|
| |
sanman I own this joint!
Number of posts : 12087 Age : 52 Location : shelbyville Registration date : 2007-06-23
| Subject: Re: Lets Discuss rationaly some of the things up on board RULES Fri Nov 27, 2009 5:44 pm | |
| THIS ISNT WHAT IS BEING QUESTIONED THE FACT THAT AMPS CAN BE RAN AT .25 THEN HAVE A RISE OF 1OHM AND THAT THE 1 OHM RISE IS MORE THAN THE NOMINAL 1OHM IS THE ISSUE THAT THEY DONT LIKE | |
|
| |
SQcrewcab Above Average Contributor
Number of posts : 801 Age : 45 Location : Springfield, IL Registration date : 2007-06-23
| Subject: Re: Lets Discuss rationaly some of the things up on board RULES Fri Nov 27, 2009 5:47 pm | |
| Yes he did Jeff, His idea was to change amp ratings to 1ohm instead of 4 ohm that way no amps will be at risk of being "to much power" but will allow people to run other amps in the classes. just an example a hifonics BXI 2010D is rated from the manufacture 650rms @ 4ohm. This amp will still not compare to the top 5 0-600 amps but right now u cant even run it in 0-600, you get put in 601-1800 with a 2k amp. I use the Hifonics amp for example because there are ALOT of "beginers" with these amps or amps like these. What he is saying is just change ratings to 1ohm, all that happens is it allows more amps to come into play. Thats it. No amps will be "outcasts" I typed this while u 2 were already replying,, my bad AND he is saying.. NO CLAMPS | |
|
| |
sanman I own this joint!
Number of posts : 12087 Age : 52 Location : shelbyville Registration date : 2007-06-23
| Subject: Re: Lets Discuss rationaly some of the things up on board RULES Fri Nov 27, 2009 5:49 pm | |
| WHATS THE COST OF ONE OF THESE AMPS????????? | |
|
| |
KickerRex Advanced Contributor
Number of posts : 2063 Age : 35 Location : Clarksdale, MS Registration date : 2008-03-05
| Subject: Re: Lets Discuss rationaly some of the things up on board RULES Fri Nov 27, 2009 5:52 pm | |
| reason I suggest this is as it is NOW for example the cactus pf600.. @ 4ohm = 600 @ 2ohm = 1200 @ 1ohm = 2400 correct? IF the ratings got changed from the way it is now to 1ohm then this amp would be allowed in 1801-3k.. Do you see what I'm saying now? YES you can still drop the imp and get sick pwr out of these amps BUT you're not gonna be able to get 4k+ out of a 0-600 amp anymore.. | |
|
| |
KickerRex Advanced Contributor
Number of posts : 2063 Age : 35 Location : Clarksdale, MS Registration date : 2008-03-05
| Subject: Re: Lets Discuss rationaly some of the things up on board RULES Fri Nov 27, 2009 5:54 pm | |
| - SQcrewcab wrote:
- Yes he did Jeff, His idea was to change amp ratings to 1ohm instead of 4 ohm that way no amps will be at risk of being "to much power" but will allow people to run other amps in the classes.
just an example a hifonics BXI 2010D is rated from the manufacture 650rms @ 4ohm. This amp will still not compare to the top 5 0-600 amps but right now u cant even run it in 0-600, you get put in 601-1800 with a 2k amp. I use the Hifonics amp for example because there are ALOT of "beginers" with these amps or amps like these. What he is saying is just change ratings to 1ohm, all that happens is it allows more amps to come into play. Thats it. No amps will be "outcasts" I typed this while u 2 were already replying,, my bad AND he is saying.. NO CLAMPS EXACTLY!!!!!!!!!!! And Jeff they can be found for less than 300 bucks | |
|
| |
KickerRex Advanced Contributor
Number of posts : 2063 Age : 35 Location : Clarksdale, MS Registration date : 2008-03-05
| Subject: Re: Lets Discuss rationaly some of the things up on board RULES Fri Nov 27, 2009 5:56 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
SQcrewcab Above Average Contributor
Number of posts : 801 Age : 45 Location : Springfield, IL Registration date : 2007-06-23
| Subject: Re: Lets Discuss rationaly some of the things up on board RULES Fri Nov 27, 2009 6:30 pm | |
| I want to say.. just guessing.. fornicate it,, i will go look.................................. $259 shipped on ebay. | |
|
| |
sanman I own this joint!
Number of posts : 12087 Age : 52 Location : shelbyville Registration date : 2007-06-23
| Subject: Re: Lets Discuss rationaly some of the things up on board RULES Fri Nov 27, 2009 7:40 pm | |
| EBAY LOL
300 ISNT REALLY THAT FAR OFF WHAT I PAY PER D5 | |
|
| |
SQcrewcab Above Average Contributor
Number of posts : 801 Age : 45 Location : Springfield, IL Registration date : 2007-06-23
| Subject: Re: Lets Discuss rationaly some of the things up on board RULES Fri Nov 27, 2009 7:54 pm | |
| yeah, what YOU pay for one. 20 people can call steve and everyone would get a different price. and a basic competitor prob pays about $675-$750 easy. Dont get me wrong Jeff, you have earned your way to get great prices like that. Some guys have to start somewhere before they get better pricing. Plus if someone gets a price even close to that and they run stock, they should be pro.. .) | |
|
| |
KickerRex Advanced Contributor
Number of posts : 2063 Age : 35 Location : Clarksdale, MS Registration date : 2008-03-05
| Subject: Re: Lets Discuss rationaly some of the things up on board RULES Fri Nov 27, 2009 7:55 pm | |
| - sanman wrote:
- EBAY LOL
300 ISNT REALLY THAT FAR OFF WHAT I PAY PER D5 thats the point man.. If the ratings were to go to 1ohm the the d5 would also be in 1801-3k bc I assume its 500@4ohm 1k@2ohm and 2k@2ohm.. 1801-3k is the 2nd biggest stock class there is.. Is it making sense now? | |
|
| |
hunterw Advanced Contributor
Number of posts : 1172 Age : 38 Registration date : 2007-11-04
| Subject: Re: Lets Discuss rationaly some of the things up on board RULES Fri Nov 27, 2009 8:01 pm | |
| with a hifonics amp...are you really looking to win anyway? lol. you guys want to make all the changes for people that will never get serious about competing lol. lets make usaci a newb org and filterr out all the vets and loud people | |
|
| |
sanman I own this joint!
Number of posts : 12087 Age : 52 Location : shelbyville Registration date : 2007-06-23
| Subject: Re: Lets Discuss rationaly some of the things up on board RULES Fri Nov 27, 2009 8:02 pm | |
| NOT REALLY SINCE 4 OHM IS WHAT WE USE AT 14.4V TO TST AMPS THATS BEEN USACI'S WAY OF DOING IT FOR YEARS NOW
AND WHO IS TO SAY THE BX?? SHOULDNT BE RATED AT 500@4 EXCEPT FOR THE MANU THEY ARE THE ONES PRODUCING THE RATINGS DOESNT MEAN THEY CANT BE RATED LOWER THOUGH IF THEY WANTED THEM TO BE.
EXAMPLE PYRAMID HAS A 4K WATT AMP WE ALL KNOW IT WONT DO THAT | |
|
| |
sanman I own this joint!
Number of posts : 12087 Age : 52 Location : shelbyville Registration date : 2007-06-23
| Subject: Re: Lets Discuss rationaly some of the things up on board RULES Fri Nov 27, 2009 8:03 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
SQcrewcab Above Average Contributor
Number of posts : 801 Age : 45 Location : Springfield, IL Registration date : 2007-06-23
| Subject: Re: Lets Discuss rationaly some of the things up on board RULES Fri Nov 27, 2009 8:06 pm | |
| - hunterw wrote:
- with a hifonics amp...are you really looking to win anyway? lol. you guys want to make all the changes for people that will never get serious about competing lol. lets make usaci a newb org and filterr out all the vets and loud people
Cant say that becaus right now they dont have a chance to get serious. They show up with a amp that does less power than most and ALSO get thrown in a higher class, Get beat by 10db..makes it hard to want to try. how would changing to 1ohm ratings filter out the vets and loud? | |
|
| |
sanman I own this joint!
Number of posts : 12087 Age : 52 Location : shelbyville Registration date : 2007-06-23
| Subject: Re: Lets Discuss rationaly some of the things up on board RULES Fri Nov 27, 2009 8:10 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
sanman I own this joint!
Number of posts : 12087 Age : 52 Location : shelbyville Registration date : 2007-06-23
| Subject: Re: Lets Discuss rationaly some of the things up on board RULES Fri Nov 27, 2009 8:11 pm | |
| LOL HERE WE GO AGAIN I CANT WIN WITH THIS PARTICULAR AMPS SO I WANNA CRY | |
|
| |
hunterw Advanced Contributor
Number of posts : 1172 Age : 38 Registration date : 2007-11-04
| Subject: Re: Lets Discuss rationaly some of the things up on board RULES Fri Nov 27, 2009 8:14 pm | |
| - SQcrewcab wrote:
- hunterw wrote:
- with a hifonics amp...are you really looking to win anyway? lol. you guys want to make all the changes for people that will never get serious about competing lol. lets make usaci a newb org and filterr out all the vets and loud people
Cant say that becaus right now they dont have a chance to get serious. They show up with a amp that does less power than most and ALSO get thrown in a higher class, Get beat by 10db..makes it hard to want to try. how would changing to 1ohm ratings filter out the vets and loud? i got beat all the time my first year. all the time in the subby wagon, but i came back cuz i love it.they are given a chance. it always is made it seem at every show that everyone that takes first does 155 plus. sooo not the case lol. and 1 ohm rating are fine with me. but i like 4 ohm better and say just leave everything alone. | |
|
| |
hunterw Advanced Contributor
Number of posts : 1172 Age : 38 Registration date : 2007-11-04
| Subject: Re: Lets Discuss rationaly some of the things up on board RULES Fri Nov 27, 2009 8:15 pm | |
| - SQcrewcab wrote:
- hunterw wrote:
- with a hifonics amp...are you really looking to win anyway? lol. you guys want to make all the changes for people that will never get serious about competing lol. lets make usaci a newb org and filterr out all the vets and loud people
Cant say that becaus right now they dont have a chance to get serious. They show up with a amp that does less power than most and ALSO get thrown in a higher class, Get beat by 10db..makes it hard to want to try. how would changing to 1ohm ratings filter out the vets and loud? and changing to 1 ohm ratings isnt going to give themmore of a chance to win lol. they will still lose by 10db lol. btw aaron i about to punch my savage in the face. | |
|
| |
SQcrewcab Above Average Contributor
Number of posts : 801 Age : 45 Location : Springfield, IL Registration date : 2007-06-23
| Subject: Re: Lets Discuss rationaly some of the things up on board RULES Fri Nov 27, 2009 8:18 pm | |
| who the F is crying, all i am saying is let them at least try. right now they dont even get a chance, they get shafted for having a entry level amp. I dont get why you guys are so worried. I dont want anything to happen to the amps you run now, nothing. all we want to do is let entry level guys run in power classes where they have a "shot' I am sure most of these amps wont take first unless they come out with a great build. i dont get why you are so worried about a guy running your class with a fornicating $300 ebay amp. Hunter, it may make it a 7db difference if they could run in a equal power class.
I will sell you all my savage stuff for $175.. all of it... | |
|
| |
sanman I own this joint!
Number of posts : 12087 Age : 52 Location : shelbyville Registration date : 2007-06-23
| Subject: Re: Lets Discuss rationaly some of the things up on board RULES Fri Nov 27, 2009 8:21 pm | |
| THEY HAVE A CHANCE ITS CALLED LOCAL WHY DO YOU GUYS NOT NDERSTAND THAT CLASS IS THERE FOR THEM THIS IS WHERE THEY LEARN AT AND YA KNOW I RAGGED ON DAVE FOR HAVING CRUNCH AMPS AND I COMMEND HIM FOR MAKING IT TO FNALS AND ATLEAST GIVING IT A TRY INSTEAD OF SITTING AT HOME SUCKING HIS THUMB | |
|
| |
hunterw Advanced Contributor
Number of posts : 1172 Age : 38 Registration date : 2007-11-04
| Subject: Re: Lets Discuss rationaly some of the things up on board RULES Fri Nov 27, 2009 8:23 pm | |
| - SQcrewcab wrote:
- who the F is crying, all i am saying is let them at least try. right now they dont even get a chance, they get shafted for having a entry level amp.
I dont get why you guys are so worried. I dont want anything to happen to the amps you run now, nothing. all we want to do is let entry level guys run in power classes where they have a "shot' I am sure most of these amps wont take first unless they come out with a great build. i dont get why you are so worried about a guy running your class with a fornicating $300 ebay amp. Hunter, it may make it a 7db difference if they could run in a equal power class.
I will sell you all my savage stuff for $175.. all of it... im not worried about it really. lol. i jut wish everything will be left alone. truck and and all?? lol | |
|
| |
SQcrewcab Above Average Contributor
Number of posts : 801 Age : 45 Location : Springfield, IL Registration date : 2007-06-23
| Subject: Re: Lets Discuss rationaly some of the things up on board RULES Fri Nov 27, 2009 8:28 pm | |
| Well if all this is crap Jeff. Do you have any ideas how to expand our hobby, how to bring in new blood, how to have more than 2-3 people in a class at finals? | |
|
| |
sanman I own this joint!
Number of posts : 12087 Age : 52 Location : shelbyville Registration date : 2007-06-23
| Subject: Re: Lets Discuss rationaly some of the things up on board RULES Fri Nov 27, 2009 8:30 pm | |
| LOL FINALS IS STARTING TO GROW AGAIN FINALLY NOW WE WANNA CHANGE IT ALL AROUND ONE MORE TIME I PERSONALLY FEEL THIS SINT THE WAY TO DO IT.
HOW ABOUT EDUCATED DIRECTORS ON THE RULES/CLASSES/ AD THE WAY SHOWS ARE TO BE RAN ALL YEAR LONG ONE THING IS FOR SURE YOU WILL HEAR PEOPLE BITCHING ABOUT THESE THIN GS RIGHT HERE | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Lets Discuss rationaly some of the things up on board RULES | |
| |
|
| |
| Lets Discuss rationaly some of the things up on board RULES | |
|