Iron vs. Rice

when it comes down to it which is faster and why? what car would you use to drag race in?

SCOTTS 1989 CRX IN KANSAS CITY KANSAS

1.8 FULLY BUILT GARRETT TURBO

897FWHP

7:20 IN THE 1/4 MILE BABABABABAY

How can you compare..... it's so much deeper than who's faster. Iron is pure muscle and power, which makes it sexy as hell. The sound of muscle compared to rice patties is even hotter!

bzzzzzzzz vs. VaROOOOOOOOOM!!!


yeah, that's my 2 cents

BZZZZZ HUH PUT THAT VIBRATOR DOWN

sanman wrote:

BZZZZZ HUH PUT THAT VIBRATOR DOWN

nah, mine is pure muscle..... I divorced bzzzzzzzz and went on to Varooom!!!

scionsoloxb wrote:

sanman wrote:

BZZZZZ HUH PUT THAT VIBRATOR DOWN

lol

blahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha


man that some dammm good beer ure drinking tonight

LMAO.. That was funny right there Jen. LOL

*bows*

Thank you, thank you.....

Take the same amount of money and apply it to a Good 'ol american muscle and see what u got.
Sorry to say,but as much as I like ricers,american cars will outperform them anytime.

86 Grand national
70 Hemi cuda
70 Hemi Charger(the new chargers are just new intrepids)
03 Ford mustang cobra
any year corvette
Ford Fairlane
1995 Saleen Mustang s351
AC Cobra
1968 Pontiac GTO
1969 Mustang GT 500
2008 Mustang GT 500
1970 Superbird
Ford GT 40
Apply the same dollar amount that U spend on a ricer to any of the irons....and see what happens in a quarter mile-not 1/8 mile.

i see racers with american muscle all the time with 15k in there motors running 8's now thats a great time but the ricer will out perform them an every weekend at the track doesnt lie

Will trade for Fast CRX!!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=45lWzw821pI&feature=related

I haven't seen a Honda or Toyota or Nissan at the Barret-Jackson auction mat yet. If U have, let me know.Maybe I missed it.

I have seen a Supra and a Skyline on there once or twice

Don't do it Kenny!!!

2 compared to 1000's.

dbracer79 wrote:

Don't do it Kenny!!!

HA NEVER!!!
Got a new rearend going in it this weekend hopefully it should hook alot better then the last one.

thats cause barret jackson is about old ass antique cars man

Not really, It's where real cars go man.

What gears in it Kenny? 3:55 or 3:73.

real cars yu guys kill me with ure opiniated statements

the real reason ure pissed off at the ricers is cause we get 600+hp at 20mpg lol and you dont even come close

dbracer79 wrote:

Not really, It's where real cars go man.

What gears in it Kenny? 3:55 or 3:73.

3.73

There is a interesting point jeff. You're right. In this time of crisis with gas yes. But,it really has nothing to do with gas.

Come on,Picture U in a 1957 Bel Air,2 bench seats, only U and your wife right next to U(no bucket seats),cruising on sunset blvd with a 350 chevy block-350 hp on tap.Flowmasters 2chambers.
Sorry, just my imagination took me over.

TeamSpead-Kenny wrote:

dbracer79 wrote:

Not really, It's where real cars go man.

What gears in it Kenny? 3:55 or 3:73.

3.73

Carefull on the highway with that.

I'll take a 69 charger or challenger with a 440 hemi and easy 500+ hp and 400+ ftq.

Btw.. the test of the original 440 hemi was alot more then the published on the sticker. LOL

Moparbass28 wrote:

I'll take a 69 charger or challenger with a 440 hemi and easy 500+ hp and 400+ ftq.

Btw.. the test of the original 440 hemi was alot more then the published on the sticker. LOL

Correct,cause Mopar wanted to fool the dot that the car was not build for the street.

Nobody's pissed off at ricepatties... it's about appreciating CLASSIC vehicles, and real American muscle.

I drive a damn honda, it's got over 370,000 miles on it, but I'd RATHER have a 1971 El Camino. My first car was a 75 Chevy Impala with a stock 350 engine, but it had power. God, I loved that car.

well my 410hp to the wheels mind you and 348lbs of torque is fine with me on the streets at 1984lbs

now when i hit the track at c16(110 octane) and change the settings on the ems to track and get 634whp and 498lbs of torque im reallly goood