| Author | Message |
|---|
cody08
Advanced Contributor
Number of posts : 1674
Age : 39
Location : Junction City, KS
Registration date : 2009-06-12
 |  Subject: Re: actual sb frequencies  Wed Oct 27, 2010 2:35 pm | |
| So its not 53 if it doesn't go through? Lol | |
|
| | |
The_Rowlands
I own this joint!
Number of posts : 7398
Age : 58
Location : MIDWEST
Registration date : 2007-08-08
| | Subject: Re: actual sb frequencies Wed Oct 27, 2010 2:49 pm | |
| he used the same song i do 53hz | |
|
| | |
chrisbaldelli
Above Average Contributor
Number of posts : 559
Age : 39
Location : Houston, TX
Registration date : 2008-11-30
| | Subject: Re: actual sb frequencies Wed Oct 27, 2010 2:59 pm | |
| Other than Bass Cube, Quad Force, and Eminem.... what songs got air time at Finals? I didn't talk music with too many people, but from what I heard in the lanes, it was a pretty limited playlist. I used Bass Cube because the squid box in sub-up, port-back... got the same score (roughly) between 53 and 57 Hz. Kinda weird, and probably inefficient. Made me happy not to publicly support the abysmal music of Three Six Mafia. 
Last edited by chrisbaldelli on Wed Oct 27, 2010 3:03 pm; edited 1 time in total | |
|
| | |
fstfred
Novice Contributor
Number of posts : 208
Age : 53
Location : Arlington,Texas
Registration date : 2009-07-12
| | Subject: Re: actual sb frequencies Wed Oct 27, 2010 3:00 pm | |
| yes if it doesnt go through its a 52, lol | |
|
| | |
poundstone
Advanced Contributor
Number of posts : 1900
Age : 41
Location : decatur, il
Registration date : 2010-06-05
| | Subject: Re: actual sb frequencies Wed Oct 27, 2010 3:24 pm | |
| nobody used vibrate? i actually think its better then eminem! just my .02 | |
|
| | |
cody08
Advanced Contributor
Number of posts : 1674
Age : 39
Location : Junction City, KS
Registration date : 2009-06-12
| | Subject: Re: actual sb frequencies Wed Oct 27, 2010 4:13 pm | |
| - chrisbaldelli wrote:
- Other than Bass Cube, Quad Force, and Eminem.... what songs got air time at Finals? I didn't talk music with too many people, but from what I heard in the lanes, it was a pretty limited playlist.
I used Bass Cube because the squid box in sub-up, port-back... got the same score (roughly) between 53 and 57 Hz. Kinda weird, and probably inefficient. Made me happy not to publicly support the abysmal music of Three Six Mafia. Brett used a lil jon song but ill let him tell u what song it is. | |
|
| | |
Alarm God
Advanced Contributor
Number of posts : 1272
Age : 52
Location : Arlington,TX
Registration date : 2007-11-14
| | Subject: Re: actual sb frequencies Wed Oct 27, 2010 6:02 pm | |
| - poundstone wrote:
- nobody used vibrate? i actually think its better then eminem! just my .02
Which eminem song. | |
|
| | |
poundstone
Advanced Contributor
Number of posts : 1900
Age : 41
Location : decatur, il
Registration date : 2010-06-05
| | Subject: Re: actual sb frequencies Wed Oct 27, 2010 6:05 pm | |
| - Alarm God wrote:
- poundstone wrote:
- nobody used vibrate? i actually think its better then eminem! just my .02
Which eminem song. go to sleep! im pretty sure they are the same but i just think vibrate is more steady. | |
|
| | |
poundstone
Advanced Contributor
Number of posts : 1900
Age : 41
Location : decatur, il
Registration date : 2010-06-05
| | Subject: Re: actual sb frequencies Wed Oct 27, 2010 6:06 pm | |
| same as in they are both 53-54 hz. | |
|
| | |
Alarm God
Advanced Contributor
Number of posts : 1272
Age : 52
Location : Arlington,TX
Registration date : 2007-11-14
| | Subject: Re: actual sb frequencies Wed Oct 27, 2010 6:44 pm | |
| Well Fred found another song that worked well before the rebuild. Just don't remember the name. | |
|
| | |
poundstone
Advanced Contributor
Number of posts : 1900
Age : 41
Location : decatur, il
Registration date : 2010-06-05
| | Subject: Re: actual sb frequencies Wed Oct 27, 2010 6:51 pm | |
| yeah i used petey pablo vibrate and its pretty steady id check it out! | |
|
| | |
Alarm God
Advanced Contributor
Number of posts : 1272
Age : 52
Location : Arlington,TX
Registration date : 2007-11-14
| | Subject: Re: actual sb frequencies Wed Oct 27, 2010 7:02 pm | |
| oh we have like I said before the rebuild Fred would switch between vibrate,go to sleep, and that other song. | |
|
| | |
poundstone
Advanced Contributor
Number of posts : 1900
Age : 41
Location : decatur, il
Registration date : 2010-06-05
| | Subject: Re: actual sb frequencies Wed Oct 27, 2010 7:55 pm | |
| yeah i bet!lol im sure theres more i have no idea about but vibrate i thought was better then go to sleep. imo at least in my setup. | |
|
| | |
fstfred
Novice Contributor
Number of posts : 208
Age : 53
Location : Arlington,Texas
Registration date : 2009-07-12
| | Subject: Re: actual sb frequencies Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:03 pm | |
| vibrate is a better song then go to sleep | |
|
| | |
2003f150
Thats a Lot of Posts!
Number of posts : 2610
Age : 41
Location : Biloxi,MS
Registration date : 2007-09-12
| |
| | |
cody08
Advanced Contributor
Number of posts : 1674
Age : 39
Location : Junction City, KS
Registration date : 2009-06-12
| |
| | |
2003f150
Thats a Lot of Posts!
Number of posts : 2610
Age : 41
Location : Biloxi,MS
Registration date : 2007-09-12
| | Subject: Re: actual sb frequencies Tue Nov 02, 2010 9:56 am | |
| The song sucks cody as you saw....with my other song it would have been 159.5+ | |
|
| | |
Sponsored content
| | Subject: Re: actual sb frequencies | |
| |
|
| | |
| | actual sb frequencies | |
|
Calendar
