| subwoofers tested today | |
|
+11BigE bumpin s-10 Alan_Hall Alan TECH114 DMAN BoominD zacdavis SPL2K sanman TAMU 15 posters |
|
Author | Message |
---|
TAMU Advanced Contributor
Number of posts : 1548 Location : TEXAS Registration date : 2007-06-23
| Subject: subwoofers tested today Sat Feb 09, 2008 5:19 pm | |
| test were done with 1 kicker 1500.1 all at 1 ohm in 1.5 cubic ft ported 2 aeroports. changed face for the kicker. inwood 12 d4=143.2 pyramid super pro 12 d4 145.8 ap 12 d.9 thats what it showed on the meter 149.1 cerwin vega vmax 12 d2=149.6 t3 audio tss12 d2=150.9 kicker l7 d2=151.1 this test may be flawed because 3 of the first 4 subs were maxed out powerwise,and the last 2 needed a bit more power so the results could change. | |
|
| |
sanman I own this joint!
Number of posts : 12087 Age : 52 Location : shelbyville Registration date : 2007-06-23
| Subject: Re: subwoofers tested today Sat Feb 09, 2008 5:30 pm | |
| done suprse me the l7 is more efficient than that t3 other wise with a ton more power the t3 would probly take over but this is the reason we love kicker you dont need all the power | |
|
| |
SPL2K Basic Contributor
Number of posts : 432 Age : 114 Location : Lake Havasu Registration date : 2007-08-15
| Subject: Re: subwoofers tested today Sat Feb 09, 2008 6:56 pm | |
| cone area FTW. | |
|
| |
zacdavis Above Average Contributor
Number of posts : 917 Age : 47 Registration date : 2007-06-28
| Subject: Re: subwoofers tested today Sat Feb 09, 2008 7:22 pm | |
| - SPL2K wrote:
- cone area FTW.
Exactly, larger diaphram, the L7 is closer to a 15 than a 12 | |
|
| |
BoominD Novice Contributor
Number of posts : 82 Age : 51 Registration date : 2007-06-23
| Subject: Re: subwoofers tested today Sun Feb 10, 2008 1:25 am | |
| With the L7's in my rex my round 12's where louder by .3db. | |
|
| |
DMAN Advanced Contributor
Number of posts : 2007 Age : 52 Location : Grand Junction, Colorado Registration date : 2007-06-23
| Subject: Re: subwoofers tested today Sun Feb 10, 2008 1:34 am | |
| - TAMU wrote:
- test were done with 1 kicker 1500.1 all at 1 ohm in 1.5 cubic ft ported 2 aeroports.
changed face for the kicker. inwood 12 d4=143.2 pyramid super pro 12 d4 145.8 ap 12 d.9 thats what it showed on the meter 149.1 cerwin vega vmax 12 d2=149.6 t3 audio tss12 d2=150.9 kicker l7 d2=151.1 this test may be flawed because 3 of the first 4 subs were maxed out powerwise,and the last 2 needed a bit more power so the results could change. Not tryin to be a smart pooter, well maybe, but how did you get 1 D4 down to 1 ohm | |
|
| |
TECH114 Thats a Lot of Posts!
Number of posts : 4748 Age : 50 Location : Town of DBs Registration date : 2007-06-24
| Subject: Re: subwoofers tested today Sun Feb 10, 2008 1:44 am | |
| - DMAN wrote:
- TAMU wrote:
- test were done with 1 kicker 1500.1 all at 1 ohm in 1.5 cubic ft ported 2 aeroports.
changed face for the kicker. inwood 12 d4=143.2 pyramid super pro 12 d4 145.8 ap 12 d.9 thats what it showed on the meter 149.1 cerwin vega vmax 12 d2=149.6 t3 audio tss12 d2=150.9 kicker l7 d2=151.1 this test may be flawed because 3 of the first 4 subs were maxed out powerwise,and the last 2 needed a bit more power so the results could change. Not tryin to be a smart pooter, well maybe, but how did you get 1 D4 down to 1 ohm Good point | |
|
| |
Alan Thats a Lot of Posts!
Number of posts : 3897 Age : 44 Location : Watson Louisiana Registration date : 2008-02-05
| Subject: Re: subwoofers tested today Sun Feb 10, 2008 2:28 am | |
| what ohm did you run the atomic at? .45 or 1.8? | |
|
| |
TAMU Advanced Contributor
Number of posts : 1548 Location : TEXAS Registration date : 2007-06-23
| Subject: Re: subwoofers tested today Sun Feb 10, 2008 4:13 am | |
| - DMAN wrote:
- TAMU wrote:
- test were done with 1 kicker 1500.1 all at 1 ohm in 1.5 cubic ft ported 2 aeroports.
changed face for the kicker.
inwood 12 d4=143.2 pyramid super pro 12 d4 145.8 ap 12 d.9 thats what it showed on the meter 149.1 cerwin vega vmax 12 d2=149.6 t3 audio tss12 d2=150.9 kicker l7 d2=151.1
this test may be flawed because 3 of the first 4 subs were maxed out powerwise,and the last 2 needed a bit more power so the results could change. Not tryin to be a smart pooter, well maybe, but how did you get 1 D4 down to 1 ohm i realized that after i typed it and didnt really care to change it.who really cares about those 3 anyway. | |
|
| |
TAMU Advanced Contributor
Number of posts : 1548 Location : TEXAS Registration date : 2007-06-23
| Subject: Re: subwoofers tested today Sun Feb 10, 2008 4:19 am | |
| - Alan wrote:
- what ohm did you run the atomic at? .45 or 1.8?
neither it said .53 | |
|
| |
TAMU Advanced Contributor
Number of posts : 1548 Location : TEXAS Registration date : 2007-06-23
| Subject: Re: subwoofers tested today Sun Feb 10, 2008 4:31 am | |
| will have video of the l7 vs t3 rematch in a week or so.each will be ran off 1 of my mmats 3000.05. | |
|
| |
Alan_Hall Novice Contributor
Number of posts : 104 Age : 44 Registration date : 2007-11-23
| Subject: Re: subwoofers tested today Sun Feb 10, 2008 11:21 am | |
| im suprised the ap wasent a little louder...anyway... | |
|
| |
sanman I own this joint!
Number of posts : 12087 Age : 52 Location : shelbyville Registration date : 2007-06-23
| Subject: Re: subwoofers tested today Sun Feb 10, 2008 12:44 pm | |
| box Alan we know this is the real key to a subs beoing at peek performance man | |
|
| |
bumpin s-10 Above Average Contributor
Number of posts : 747 Registration date : 2007-06-23
| Subject: Re: subwoofers tested today Sun Feb 10, 2008 9:31 pm | |
| Exactly...the test really means nothing if all the subs were simply put in the same size enclosure. Each sub would need to be put in it's own optimum sized box. Than and only then the test would be worth something. | |
|
| |
BigE Novice Contributor
Number of posts : 118 Age : 52 Location : El Paso TX Registration date : 2007-06-26
| Subject: Re: subwoofers tested today Sun Feb 10, 2008 10:44 pm | |
| - bumpin s-10 wrote:
- Exactly...the test really means nothing if all the subs were simply put in the same size enclosure. Each sub would need to be put in it's own optimum sized box. Than and only then the test would be worth something.
I totally agree. By these tests I'd go with the pyramids. LOL | |
|
| |
TAMU Advanced Contributor
Number of posts : 1548 Location : TEXAS Registration date : 2007-06-23
| Subject: Re: subwoofers tested today Mon Feb 11, 2008 2:00 am | |
| - bumpin s-10 wrote:
- Exactly...the test really means nothing if all the subs were simply put in the same size enclosure. Each sub would need to be put in it's own optimum sized box. Than and only then the test would be worth something.
THATS WHY THEY ARE GOING IN THE 1.75 BOX THAT KICKER RECOMMENDS,ITS ALSO A GOOD FIT FOR THE T3'S ALSO. | |
|
| |
J.Demuth Novice Contributor
Number of posts : 72 Age : 50 Location : ATLANTA,GA Registration date : 2008-02-11
| Subject: Re: subwoofers tested today Mon Feb 11, 2008 5:39 pm | |
| LOL, that box is too small for the TSS, and 1500 watts is barely tickling his tummy..... Go for 2.3 cubes and mo powa.
P.S. The TS woofer is comparable to the L7 on paper and similarity..
Being that the power level was so low, I am astonished that the TSS was only .2 off..... lets see some powa!
Last edited by on Mon Feb 11, 2008 5:54 pm; edited 1 time in total | |
|
| |
J.Demuth Novice Contributor
Number of posts : 72 Age : 50 Location : ATLANTA,GA Registration date : 2008-02-11
| |
| |
sanman I own this joint!
Number of posts : 12087 Age : 52 Location : shelbyville Registration date : 2007-06-23
| Subject: Re: subwoofers tested today Mon Feb 11, 2008 5:55 pm | |
| subs that last more than 2 shows and get fixed and returned withing a year ftmfw Kicker | |
|
| |
J.Demuth Novice Contributor
Number of posts : 72 Age : 50 Location : ATLANTA,GA Registration date : 2008-02-11
| Subject: Re: subwoofers tested today Mon Feb 11, 2008 5:59 pm | |
| Is that an invite?
Trust me, I just popped in to comment... I won't make a habit of arguing on here.... I am here to make friends and help anyone that I can.....
My speakers speak for themselves.... but they don't have the number of competitors over here that I do in other organizations....
I am humble and can only hope to have the success of Kicker one day. | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: subwoofers tested today Mon Feb 11, 2008 7:06 pm | |
| more power on the L7, and also Tamu, is it an 08 L7? |
|
| |
J.Demuth Novice Contributor
Number of posts : 72 Age : 50 Location : ATLANTA,GA Registration date : 2008-02-11
| Subject: Re: subwoofers tested today Mon Feb 11, 2008 7:14 pm | |
| Hey Tracy, loser buys the winner a beer in Daytona! LOL... Either way, there is no loser! | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: subwoofers tested today Mon Feb 11, 2008 7:16 pm | |
| drinking beer, there is NEVER a lose/lose situation |
|
| |
J.Demuth Novice Contributor
Number of posts : 72 Age : 50 Location : ATLANTA,GA Registration date : 2008-02-11
| Subject: Re: subwoofers tested today Mon Feb 11, 2008 7:18 pm | |
| - Polecat wrote:
- drinking beer, there is NEVER a lose/lose situation
No doubt!! It is on!!!!! I was thinking.... Heck, it is an honor to even be compared to Kicker..... | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: subwoofers tested today Mon Feb 11, 2008 7:22 pm | |
| hey, it's car audio, nothing is ever too serious |
|
| |
Kicker Kevin Advanced Contributor
Number of posts : 1376 Age : 39 Location : Kansas City Registration date : 2007-06-29
| |
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: subwoofers tested today Mon Feb 11, 2008 7:33 pm | |
| 'car audio' is...but kevin takes this SEREIOUS |
|
| |
Kicker Kevin Advanced Contributor
Number of posts : 1376 Age : 39 Location : Kansas City Registration date : 2007-06-29
| Subject: Re: subwoofers tested today Mon Feb 11, 2008 7:36 pm | |
| - Polecat wrote:
- 'car audio' is...but kevin takes this SERIOUS
As with anything I do! Thank you. | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: subwoofers tested today Mon Feb 11, 2008 7:37 pm | |
| I can tell dog! crazy man |
|
| |
super stock crx Advanced Contributor
Number of posts : 1834 Age : 38 Location : LTX Registration date : 2007-06-24
| Subject: Re: subwoofers tested today Mon Feb 11, 2008 9:09 pm | |
| - Polecat wrote:
- more power on the L7, and also Tamu, is it an 08 L7?
06 | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: subwoofers tested today | |
| |
|
| |
| subwoofers tested today | |
|