Author | Message |
---|
slumpinhonda Thats a Lot of Posts!
Number of posts : 2938 Age : 37 Location : BFE Nebraska Registration date : 2007-06-23
| Subject: Re: 0-600 post that dis-appeard. Wed Jul 04, 2007 8:17 pm | |
| the 3000.05 isnt gunna do 4400 if the 3500.05 is only doin 3600-3700 | |
|
| |
johnperdeye Advanced Contributor
Number of posts : 1406 Age : 46 Location : jackson, mississippi Registration date : 2007-06-25
| Subject: Re: 0-600 post that dis-appeard. Wed Jul 04, 2007 8:37 pm | |
| well i thought the rerated the ab400.1 | |
|
| |
sanman I own this joint!
Number of posts : 12087 Age : 52 Location : shelbyville Registration date : 2007-06-23
| Subject: Re: 0-600 post that dis-appeard. Thu Jul 05, 2007 3:40 am | |
| well every thought it was rerrated except for the main office wich kinda tells me it was just spread the word type of thing and people fell for it kinda like me
the 3000.05 does 4400 watts i said i had it and tested it at .25 on 2 odesy 2150's you can sit and deny all day long, but the way i see you is a procrastinator actually its the old debate lets dog this amp to cover our own
the new db amp coming ut that will do 4000 watts but rated at 6000 is yet another questinable amp but noone will say anything about it till its to late also wich btw is the new amp coming out you guys have been tlking or thinking about
no matter how you dice it up its all b/s to me always has been always will be ratings suck | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: 0-600 post that dis-appeard. Thu Jul 05, 2007 8:42 am | |
| jeff how do you test the power output of an amp, cause the stuff i see your numbers are always high, sometimes really high. |
|
| |
aphinney Advanced Contributor
Number of posts : 1305 Age : 36 Location : omaha ne Registration date : 2007-06-23
| Subject: Re: 0-600 post that dis-appeard. Thu Jul 05, 2007 9:24 am | |
| the way we test isnt on peak...
true rms is the only way to go | |
|
| |
sanman I own this joint!
Number of posts : 12087 Age : 52 Location : shelbyville Registration date : 2007-06-23
| Subject: Re: 0-600 post that dis-appeard. Thu Jul 05, 2007 3:11 pm | |
| well correct peak hold and if thats the case then no dought the 400 is spot on at 600 I do test amps the way that MT Estes showed me and I have also watched him do many times and not to many people actually doguth him for whats its worth i was meary starting poop in here but now im getting a little more into this
1 400.1 in my car at finals 2 years ago did 156.3
2 3000.05 did 156.4 that mean there is a good comparison between the amps except i wasnt no where near the ohm range the mmats needed dont get mad cause you run an amp tat somneone else has and you dont want it put out there
chad last year with 2 3000.05's and 6 12's much like i had except i had a more efficient box amost did the same number as me with them and i had 2 200.1's on 17v so this is not a maybe deal its the real dea dont like it get over it but it is what it is | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: 0-600 post that dis-appeard. Thu Jul 05, 2007 4:12 pm | |
| and how do you know your boxes are much more effecient than mine? were talking two differant boxes and two differant cars here. we clamped the amps and were getting about 3300 watts out of one, and with 2 i figure more voltage loss, so probably a bit less per amp.
but anyway yeah, if a mmats does 4400 watts then a 158.3 can be done all day long, because we clamped the 2 IA20.1's in my car and thats what they do, 4400, could maybe do a couple hundred more watts with good voltage, but i still havent fixed that, so... if my box isn't as efficient as yours then you should have no problem doing 159+ with one mmats right? |
|
| |
sanman I own this joint!
Number of posts : 12087 Age : 52 Location : shelbyville Registration date : 2007-06-23
| Subject: Re: 0-600 post that dis-appeard. Thu Jul 05, 2007 4:22 pm | |
| first off running yuor mouth to me wont solve poop i have only heard one guy that ran these amos admit what they do and it obviousely aint you integrity problem there you might wanna fix that
second off my box is alot more efficient and if you want prove come run us on the b and k and loud and clear the class will be 601-1800pro my box tops out at 159.8 so it wont get any louder than that so the real truth lies in legal there
defendong you amops is fine with me but when you get smart i draw the line | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: 0-600 post that dis-appeard. Thu Jul 05, 2007 4:44 pm | |
| no trying to get smart or start anything jeff, just stating facts here, thats all the amps do. about 3300, maybe 3500 with good voltage...14.7 instead of 13.9. as far as boxes you should know this as well as i do, just cause your box is the best thing you have found to work in your car, doesnt mean i should build it 100% like you did in your car for my car. my car is differant, i have dynamatted rear, roof and doors, you dont. some say dynamat hurts crx's, well i havent tested so i dont know, but bruce said it doesnt hurt my car. i just had to tune it way differant for it to work.
hopefully i finally get a good run out of my 40.1 this weekend, still going to sell it, but a few weeks ago i did a 156.1 with cracked cones on 2 woofers, one in each box, one of them the cone was actually seperated from the motor. |
|
| |
sanman I own this joint!
Number of posts : 12087 Age : 52 Location : shelbyville Registration date : 2007-06-23
| Subject: Re: 0-600 post that dis-appeard. Thu Jul 05, 2007 5:03 pm | |
| well just dont forget that the amp is 900-950 not 600 man | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: 0-600 post that dis-appeard. Thu Jul 05, 2007 5:07 pm | |
| i know, i'm in 601-1800 when i run that, actually a few weeks ago when i ran it was the first time i ever ran it through the lanes, still havent decided 100% on what class to run, but i'm hoping with good woofers i can do a lot better than a 156.1, because i have done a 156.2 with 1 20.1 lol |
|
| |
bumpin s-10 Above Average Contributor
Number of posts : 747 Registration date : 2007-06-23
| Subject: Re: 0-600 post that dis-appeard. Thu Jul 05, 2007 7:28 pm | |
| what setup did you run at N.W. Audio Chad? | |
|
| |
jmorri Basic Contributor
Number of posts : 412 Age : 41 Location : KS Registration date : 2007-06-22
| Subject: Re: 0-600 post that dis-appeard. Thu Jul 05, 2007 9:26 pm | |
| i think at nw audio he had the 6 L5/L7 12s and his ia 20.1 | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: 0-600 post that dis-appeard. Thu Jul 05, 2007 9:27 pm | |
| - sanman wrote:
the new db amp coming ut that will do 4000 watts but rated at 6000 is yet another questinable amp but noone will say anything about it till its to late also wich btw is the new amp coming out you guys have been tlking or thinking about
no matter how you dice it up its all b/s to me always has been always will be ratings suck first of all I'm just asking for clarification, so don't get all bent out of shape lil he-man 1. it boggles my mind how you seem to know, cause apparently you've done testing with it cause you stated wattages and ratings, about an amp that isn't even out. 2. why exactly would you consider an amp that, according to your statement, does 4000 watts and is rated at 6000? sounds to me that if these ratings are correct then the amp is actually rated 2000 watts more than it actually does. |
|
| |
jmorri Basic Contributor
Number of posts : 412 Age : 41 Location : KS Registration date : 2007-06-22
| Subject: Re: 0-600 post that dis-appeard. Thu Jul 05, 2007 9:39 pm | |
| actually, i think he meant to say the rating is going to probably be 600@4ohm... | |
|
| |
cavi_in_kc Above Average Contributor
Number of posts : 929 Age : 42 Location : Overland Park, Kansas Registration date : 2007-06-24
| Subject: Re: 0-600 post that dis-appeard. Thu Jul 05, 2007 9:39 pm | |
| EDIT: Justin beat me to it. Dang you Justin. | |
|
| |
charlesestes Advanced Contributor
Number of posts : 1009 Age : 51 Registration date : 2007-06-25
| Subject: Re: 0-600 post that dis-appeard. Thu Jul 05, 2007 9:49 pm | |
| there is no new dbdrive amp coming out this year jeff. thats rob getting you guys all worked up. if and when it does come out it will have a proper rating, its a dbdrive amp not atomic or american bass. | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| |
| |
Navi Thats a Lot of Posts!
Number of posts : 3105 Age : 47 Location : Victoria, TX Registration date : 2007-06-25
| Subject: Re: 0-600 post that dis-appeard. Thu Jul 05, 2007 10:03 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: 0-600 post that dis-appeard. Thu Jul 05, 2007 10:24 pm | |
| at nw i ran 1 20.1 and of course my 6 L5 12's, if i throw the other 20.1 in there it does about 158.3 on a good day if both amps decide they want to work at the same time and i have decent voltage |
|
| |
sanman I own this joint!
Number of posts : 12087 Age : 52 Location : shelbyville Registration date : 2007-06-23
| Subject: Re: 0-600 post that dis-appeard. Fri Jul 06, 2007 6:44 am | |
| nah i wont flame someone that has never really did anything worth mentioning in spl
guess i can blame my success on the hamster go figure | |
|
| |
sanman I own this joint!
Number of posts : 12087 Age : 52 Location : shelbyville Registration date : 2007-06-23
| Subject: Re: 0-600 post that dis-appeard. Fri Jul 06, 2007 6:50 am | |
| 6000@.25 on 17v fool 4000@.25 on 14.7
funny osme people have made some inquiries about this amp and seems to be pretty real maybe not coming out yet but I cant say for sure have heard about it for 2 years now and still no realistinc material | |
|
| |
mod4000 Advanced Contributor
Number of posts : 1093 Location : Midland Texas Registration date : 2007-06-21
| Subject: Re: 0-600 post that dis-appeard. Fri Jul 06, 2007 6:59 am | |
| - charlesestes wrote:
- there is no new dbdrive amp coming out this year jeff. thats rob getting you guys all worked up. if and when it does come out it will have a proper rating, its a dbdrive amp not atomic or american bass.
Rob ain't said SH!T about this amp in a long time so keep me out of this one. | |
|
| |
mod4000 Advanced Contributor
Number of posts : 1093 Location : Midland Texas Registration date : 2007-06-21
| Subject: Re: 0-600 post that dis-appeard. Fri Jul 06, 2007 7:01 am | |
| - sanman wrote:
- 6000@.25 on 17v fool
4000@.25 on 14.7
funny osme people have made some inquiries about this amp and seems to be pretty real maybe not coming out yet but I cant say for sure have heard about it for 2 years now and still no realistinc material You didn't get them #'s from me, but WHEN the amp gets released it will be rated at 1000@4 | |
|
| |
AudioAnonymous Above Average Contributor
Number of posts : 736 Age : 47 Location : Titletown Registration date : 2007-06-22
| Subject: Re: 0-600 post that dis-appeard. Fri Jul 06, 2007 7:03 am | |
| | |
|
| |
Navi Thats a Lot of Posts!
Number of posts : 3105 Age : 47 Location : Victoria, TX Registration date : 2007-06-25
| Subject: Re: 0-600 post that dis-appeard. Fri Jul 06, 2007 7:19 am | |
| | |
|
| |
sanman I own this joint!
Number of posts : 12087 Age : 52 Location : shelbyville Registration date : 2007-06-23
| Subject: Re: 0-600 post that dis-appeard. Fri Jul 06, 2007 10:47 am | |
| LOL GEOFF YOU GOT WHAT YOU NEED MAN BATTS MIGHT BE A BETTER CHOICE FOR YOU AS APOSED TO GETTING NEW AMPS
WELL GLAD TO SEE THE POLL OF THE PEOPLE ON HERE CHOOSE TO SAY THE MMATS IS GOOD NOW SO I GUESS IM GOOD WITH RUNNING MINE IN 0-600 | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: 0-600 post that dis-appeard. Fri Jul 06, 2007 11:09 am | |
| i'll be running the mmats again at some point, right now i'm just messing around with what i got on hand for now |
|
| |
Stingraysevenout I own this joint!
Number of posts : 6002 Age : 51 Location : College Station Texas Registration date : 2007-06-23
| Subject: Re: 0-600 post that dis-appeard. Fri Jul 06, 2007 11:18 am | |
| You guys.... boy i tell ya.
suckamothafucka wic wic wac.
suckamothafucka yalls amps are wack.
SO HOW ARE ALL YOU GUYS TODAY.??? | |
|
| |
sanman I own this joint!
Number of posts : 12087 Age : 52 Location : shelbyville Registration date : 2007-06-23
| Subject: Re: 0-600 post that dis-appeard. Fri Jul 06, 2007 12:44 pm | |
| I GOT SOMETHING YOU CAN WACK WHILE YOUR USING YOUR MOUTH
WIKAWIKAWIKA WAK | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: 0-600 post that dis-appeard. | |
| |
|
| |
| 0-600 post that dis-appeard. | |
|