0-600 post that dis-appeard.

What will it take to win,? Barring any late amp release?

I was thinking of the past scores for 0-300. Forget about the DD m1 and 155+ was tops. We now have less batteries for bigger amps. I think the score will be high 56 or 157.

I think someone will get 160 out of 0-600. If not this year, next year for sure. The "questionably rated amp" of the year isn't out yet and we all know there will be one or two.

Th highest number ever done in 0-300 stock was kevin Ecker with two differnt sets of amps 2DDM1s 158.0, and 2XS100 158.0 I think it will be a competitive class to say the least.

Very, very competitive class!

with only one amp this year in that class im interested to see some numbers........

i can only do a 156.2 with bad voltage and a broke 20.1 that only works when it wants to so it wont be me

159 db

well all depending on what amps, might come out...

i would say stock 157-158 and i would say pro will be 158-160

Still going to be fun for me to try and even break the 50 mark Maybe some day I will be semi loud. LMAO

chad i thought u were doin 601-1800...

IF NOT ...good...

aphinney wrote:

chad i thought u were doin 601-1800...

IF NOT ...good...

He is.......but someone someone else is goin 0-600 possibly, not me tho

well according to the Usac office there is an amp out there that is rated at 600@4 that would don very well in this class I THOUGHT IT WAS RERATED TO 1000@4 but according to the main office its still 600@4


hhhhhhhhhhhmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

I know i called on that amp myself and the office told me 600@4

that amp will not be at world finals...i am making sure of it:D

still questioning the ab 400.1?

charlesestes wrote:

still questioning the ab 400.1?

every director i have talked to and the office still say 600@4 ohm

Personally I think a lot of this is scare tactics. People boasting big numbers to try and thin out the class. I believe anyone in the 157 range will be very competitive in this class. It is shaping up to be a good one for finals. For once just placing in the top 5 might mean something. Good luck to all...better make every tenth count.

i am, but you never know what might happen, and i was undecided, so i will have points in 0-600 and 601-1800, you never know my mind could be changed 10 times from now till then, but we all know it will take more than my 156.2

bumpin s-10 wrote:

Personally I think a lot of this is scare tactics. People boasting big numbers to try and thin out the class. I believe anyone in the 157 range will be very competitive in this class. It is shaping up to be a good one for finals. For once just placing in the top 5 might mean something. Good luck to all...better make every tenth count.

LIKE I SAID IN THE OTHER POST $8 SUBS WITH NO XMAX AT ALL VIDEO PROOF OF THAT =153.7 IN A UNFINISHED BOX WITH PVC PIPE NOT MY AERO PORTS.YOU WILL SEE OVER 158 AT FINALS IN THAT CLASS.

well all i have to say is...

SEE YA AT FINALS...and everyone better bring their A game cause ......

the 400.1 should be 1000w and just passed its rating, not gotten rerated lower. we've been through this and i thought the office cleared this up, but i guess not. oh well if you need and amp rated at almost twice the power class to be competitive then do what you've gotta do. dont expect much respect from a win with that amp in this class, but then again who says that amp will win.

I was wondering about the ab 400.1.. aren't the 200.1 and lower allowed in 0-600 ? Or was that 150 and lower.. damn my mem.lmao

for ab xd3000, 150.1, 200.1

and yes according to the office that was called after learning a guy ran one in 0-600 and was told it was still 600@4 by the office yes its allowed also

Charlse if an amp is allowed to run in a class why wlouldnt people run the damm thing not there fault at all all that crap your talking trying to play a guilt trip on them is just that bro

people dont care if you respesct them or not man they want the trophy ill tell you now ill be in 0-600 pro with a 200.1

I got rid of my 400 after finals now lets see i have had the 3000.05 and the 400

3000.05 does 4400 watts at .25 and roughly 14.6v
400.1 does 4629 watts at .22 and 14.9v

so the ony advantage is 17-18v for the 400

that is all

deffnot gettin 4400 out of mine on two batteries and a poop ton of runs

well your still more efficient than the big 1000 watt amo would be

so that means by other peoples word it would only d0 10 million watts instead of 20millon

I am the one who ran a 400 in 0-600. Only amp I had and I asked. I was the only one in the class so no one got their feeling hurt. It should be rated at 1000 like Charles said.Hell I didn't even stay for the trophy.

Here we go .The great American Bass debate again.

sanman wrote:

for ab xd3000, 150.1, 200.1

and yes according to the office that was called after learning a guy ran one in 0-600 and was told it was still 600@4 by the office yes its allowed also

Charlse if an amp is allowed to run in a class why wlouldnt people run the damm thing not there fault at all all that crap your talking trying to play a guilt trip on them is just that bro

people dont care if you respesct them or not man they want the trophy ill tell you now ill be in 0-600 pro with a 200.1

I got rid of my 400 after finals now lets see i have had the 3000.05 and the 400

3000.05 does 4400 watts at .25 and roughly 14.6v
400.1 does 4629 watts at .22 and 14.9v

so the ony advantage is 17-18v for the 400

that is all

So what do those pretty stealth 40.1s do at that voltage and ohm load?

CactusSounds-Geoff wrote:

sanman wrote:

for ab xd3000, 150.1, 200.1

and yes according to the office that was called after learning a guy ran one in 0-600 and was told it was still 600@4 by the office yes its allowed also

Charlse if an amp is allowed to run in a class why wlouldnt people run the damm thing not there fault at all all that crap your talking trying to play a guilt trip on them is just that bro

people dont care if you respesct them or not man they want the trophy ill tell you now ill be in 0-600 pro with a 200.1

I got rid of my 400 after finals now lets see i have had the 3000.05 and the 400

3000.05 does 4400 watts at .25 and roughly 14.6v
400.1 does 4629 watts at .22 and 14.9v

so the ony advantage is 17-18v for the 400

that is all

So what do those pretty stealth 40.1s do at that voltage and ohm load?

60,000 watts