| once deemed pro stock. | |
|
+14Matt_Sibley HellRzR gignmofo Lilredtiva Johncarr Navi SPL2K quad box mod4000 The_Rowlands STREETBEATZ19 Greg McCool zacdavis bruce-bruce 18 posters |
|
Author | Message |
---|
bruce-bruce Advanced Contributor
Number of posts : 1361 Age : 45 Registration date : 2008-06-25
| Subject: once deemed pro stock. Tue Nov 11, 2008 8:14 pm | |
| whats the procedures for one going back to stock.
dont get all jumpy I am not doing this, I know where I belong. Just was wondering, I know Jeff C was wanting to, i heard others may want to as well. | |
|
| |
zacdavis Above Average Contributor
Number of posts : 917 Age : 47 Registration date : 2007-06-28
| Subject: Re: once deemed pro stock. Tue Nov 11, 2008 8:16 pm | |
| I think the pro thing needs to be completely revised anyhow.
Anybody should be able to run either. | |
|
| |
Greg McCool Advanced Contributor
Number of posts : 1960 Age : 45 Location : Nashville, TN Registration date : 2007-09-05
| Subject: Re: once deemed pro stock. Tue Nov 11, 2008 8:18 pm | |
| I thought it was ..... you had to take a year off or somthing like that or a year away from the industry... | |
|
| |
bruce-bruce Advanced Contributor
Number of posts : 1361 Age : 45 Registration date : 2008-06-25
| Subject: Re: once deemed pro stock. Tue Nov 11, 2008 8:19 pm | |
| I just read through the rules and didnt see anything. | |
|
| |
STREETBEATZ19 Advanced Contributor
Number of posts : 1333 Age : 41 Location : Omaha (area) Nebraska Registration date : 2008-08-07
| Subject: Re: once deemed pro stock. Tue Nov 11, 2008 8:20 pm | |
| two years off is what i have been told from a couple of people | |
|
| |
bruce-bruce Advanced Contributor
Number of posts : 1361 Age : 45 Registration date : 2008-06-25
| Subject: Re: once deemed pro stock. Tue Nov 11, 2008 8:24 pm | |
| something for the committee to look at. | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: once deemed pro stock. Tue Nov 11, 2008 8:25 pm | |
| it might be in the sq rules cant remember, but something like 2-3 yrs detached from whatever made you pro to begin with |
|
| |
The_Rowlands I own this joint!
Number of posts : 7398 Age : 58 Location : MIDWEST Registration date : 2007-08-08
| Subject: Re: once deemed pro stock. Tue Nov 11, 2008 8:25 pm | |
| theres a post about it on here some place i read it about 2 months ago or so... but i forget how long ya need to be gone | |
|
| |
Greg McCool Advanced Contributor
Number of posts : 1960 Age : 45 Location : Nashville, TN Registration date : 2007-09-05
| Subject: Re: once deemed pro stock. Tue Nov 11, 2008 8:27 pm | |
| - kickercrx wrote:
- it might be in the sq rules cant remember, but something like 2-3 yrs detached from whatever made you pro to begin with
i think your right | |
|
| |
The_Rowlands I own this joint!
Number of posts : 7398 Age : 58 Location : MIDWEST Registration date : 2007-08-08
| Subject: Re: once deemed pro stock. Tue Nov 11, 2008 8:28 pm | |
| in the sq section it says 1 year | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: once deemed pro stock. Tue Nov 11, 2008 8:28 pm | |
| here is what it says in sq rules, Ralph can you confirm if this applies to spl as well
"If a competitor chooses to compete in the Advanced Consumer division, the competitor must be free of all of the above conditions for a complete competition season. Logical exceptions for a competitor to compete in the Advanced Consumer division while an immediate family member is in the car audio business will be considered by the USACI Board. Requests for such an exemption must be presented in writing by the competitor and answered in writing by the USACI Board. Such an exemption might be approved in this scenario: The competitor’s brother has a store in Boise City, Idaho, yet the competitor can show proof of retail purchase of equipment near his or her own home in Atlanta, Georgia." |
|
| |
mod4000 Advanced Contributor
Number of posts : 1093 Location : Midland Texas Registration date : 2007-06-21
| Subject: Re: once deemed pro stock. Tue Nov 11, 2008 8:36 pm | |
| 12v stock and 16v stock should be the only seperation | |
|
| |
bruce-bruce Advanced Contributor
Number of posts : 1361 Age : 45 Registration date : 2008-06-25
| Subject: Re: once deemed pro stock. Tue Nov 11, 2008 8:37 pm | |
| ding ding mutha fkin ding, we have a winner. | |
|
| |
quad box Advanced Contributor
Number of posts : 1711 Age : 58 Location : Palm Springs,Ca Registration date : 2007-06-22
| Subject: Re: once deemed pro stock. Tue Nov 11, 2008 8:37 pm | |
| two years is what i also heard. | |
|
| |
SPL2K Basic Contributor
Number of posts : 432 Age : 114 Location : Lake Havasu Registration date : 2007-08-15
| Subject: Re: once deemed pro stock. Tue Nov 11, 2008 8:47 pm | |
| Dont know what the rules say but... Once a Pro, always a Pro, in my opinion. It would be like Peyton Manning going back to play high school football. | |
|
| |
STREETBEATZ19 Advanced Contributor
Number of posts : 1333 Age : 41 Location : Omaha (area) Nebraska Registration date : 2008-08-07
| Subject: Re: once deemed pro stock. Tue Nov 11, 2008 8:47 pm | |
| and the part of working at a shop with the whole 12v 16v.. but who cares wtf i say | |
|
| |
mod4000 Advanced Contributor
Number of posts : 1093 Location : Midland Texas Registration date : 2007-06-21
| Subject: Re: once deemed pro stock. Tue Nov 11, 2008 8:51 pm | |
| Most everyone in stock gets the same discounts as a pro. | |
|
| |
Navi Thats a Lot of Posts!
Number of posts : 3105 Age : 47 Location : Victoria, TX Registration date : 2007-06-25
| Subject: Re: once deemed pro stock. Tue Nov 11, 2008 8:53 pm | |
| - SPL2K wrote:
- Dont know what the rules say but...
Once a Pro, always a Pro, in my opinion.
It would be like Peyton Manning going back to play high school football. You calling high schoolers gay? | |
|
| |
Johncarr Basic Contributor
Number of posts : 317 Age : 54 Location : Fort Worth, Texas Registration date : 2007-06-24
| Subject: Re: once deemed pro stock. Tue Nov 11, 2008 9:42 pm | |
| Some that have gone pro may not be able to afford the expense of the pro classes and want to go down to stock classes or maybe not | |
|
| |
Lilredtiva Basic Contributor
Number of posts : 443 Age : 46 Location : Nebraska Registration date : 2007-06-24
| Subject: Re: once deemed pro stock. Tue Nov 11, 2008 9:57 pm | |
| I say it should be 12v and 16v stock. I work at a shop, but I don't receive any more help than if I didn't. Pricing or otherwise. The shop I work at doesn't support my competing in any way. That is why Jason and I decided to run mod. Would have preferred to stay in a stock class, but rules say pro or above. | |
|
| |
zacdavis Above Average Contributor
Number of posts : 917 Age : 47 Registration date : 2007-06-28
| Subject: Re: once deemed pro stock. Tue Nov 11, 2008 10:45 pm | |
| - mod4000 wrote:
- 12v stock and 16v stock should be the only seperation
thats what i was sayin by anybody should be able to run either | |
|
| |
gignmofo Novice Contributor
Number of posts : 71 Registration date : 2007-07-13
| Subject: Re: once deemed pro stock. Tue Nov 11, 2008 11:06 pm | |
| does being away for two years make you lose everything you know...? Seems kinda silly and arbitrary. | |
|
| |
HellRzR Above Average Contributor
Number of posts : 800 Age : 50 Location : Leavenworth, Ks Registration date : 2007-06-30
| Subject: Re: once deemed pro stock. Tue Nov 11, 2008 11:27 pm | |
| i think jeff c. told me at one time he was told 2 years | |
|
| |
Matt_Sibley Above Average Contributor
Number of posts : 957 Age : 38 Location : Baton Rouge, LA Registration date : 2007-06-25
| Subject: Re: once deemed pro stock. Tue Nov 11, 2008 11:45 pm | |
| I was wondering this same thing except my situation is different. I was in Pro in SPL because I worked at a shop, but now that I've moved on to my engineering job and struck up an interest in SQ, should I have to be pro in SQ even though I have no shop support/experience with the SQ side of things? Interested to hear your thoughts! | |
|
| |
Stingraysevenout I own this joint!
Number of posts : 6002 Age : 51 Location : College Station Texas Registration date : 2007-06-23
| Subject: Re: once deemed pro stock. Wed Nov 12, 2008 1:21 am | |
| Its one year guys
Matt have you been away from the shop for 1 year? If so your good and thats that. | |
|
| |
Matt_Sibley Above Average Contributor
Number of posts : 957 Age : 38 Location : Baton Rouge, LA Registration date : 2007-06-25
| Subject: Re: once deemed pro stock. Wed Nov 12, 2008 11:42 am | |
| Not one year yet but by the time I get my car the way I want it, I should be good. I don't foresee a completely stealth OEM looking install winning at the finals level anyway but it would have a better chance in a consumer division than a pro division that requires a more extravagant install. I really want this car to sound great without any visible changes. Everything will look just like it did when I bought the car. | |
|
| |
zacdavis Above Average Contributor
Number of posts : 917 Age : 47 Registration date : 2007-06-28
| Subject: Re: once deemed pro stock. Wed Nov 12, 2008 12:15 pm | |
| Once a pro, if you go back, at this point...YOU ARE A WANKER!!!!!
If pro really means "PRO" then your a straight up puszy if you wanna go back to stock. What?, your balls suddenly shrunk, now your only stock?
Ok ok, I know what some of you are saying, "holy crap Zac is right again", and yeah the rest of you are saying "holy crap thats total bs Zac!"
Ok, yeah, to those that don't agree with that, re-read where I said "if" pro really means "pro". What I'm saying is IF, we are in fact all in agreement that the Pro class is reserved for and filled with the top USACi professional competitors, then hell yes once a pro always a pro.
To those of you that believe Pro is separated from Stock by nothing more than a few arbitrary rules then yeah, your right, I'm way off base to say pro is for the big boys and once a big boy always a big boy.
And guess what?, I agree. Like Robert and I have been saying for years, pro and stock really are only separated by voltage. The whole "if you work for" or "get discounts" bs, is well, flat out bs. Any and everybody in USACi gets equipment at discounted rates, EVERYBODY!!!!!!!!!, not some, ok read it again for those of you that disagree, EVERYBODY!!!!!!!!!!! yup, I challenge anybody to come on here and tell us they paid paid full retail for "ALL" the equipment in their ride, if they do, I'll be the first to slap'em across their lyin ass mouth, unless they're really huge and I'm scared of them, in that case I'll make Nene slap them for me....wait....h...now i've got myself thinkin, what if its Nene that tells me he bought everything at retail...great, now i've got myself in a pickle...back up, now that I think about it, i'm not gonna slap anybody but best believe all of us know anyone who says they paid retail, we know your a liar!!!
So that brings us to real world, not some bs, real differences, the only one I can find is voltage limit.
I say we allow anybody to run stock or Pro. The only way a person could not run Pro is if they had a formal and publicly expressed sponsorship.
Personally, I feel that stock classes are filled with talent equal to pro. "Pro" doesnt mean anything in USACi. We all know eachother, we all know who runs what, we all know we get our gear discounted, we all help eachother, we all know the stock guys are equally capable as the pros....so why do we have this fake image surrounding a class that you can walk in and out of with a years time?
I watched the World Series of Poker lastnight, there were amateurs and pros. Do you think that if one of those pros stopped playing for a year he could come back as a regular player?
The idea of having Pro stock and Stock is fine IF USACi would RESPECT the word PRO. They would have to change the rules to once PRO always PRO, if not, then pro doesnt mean jack sh!t other than using 16volt systems. In the current state, anybody should be able to run Pro or Stock, regardless of their work history or buying power.
Lets call a spade a spade.
If you truly think of yourself as a pro and think your better than stockers, then tell Ralph you feel that once a pro always a pro and you cant ever go back, until then, your nothing more than a stocker with 16volt batts, believe it. | |
|
| |
Greg McCool Advanced Contributor
Number of posts : 1960 Age : 45 Location : Nashville, TN Registration date : 2007-09-05
| Subject: Re: once deemed pro stock. Wed Nov 12, 2008 1:12 pm | |
| Im fell ya on that one Z.. 1+ | |
|
| |
sanman I own this joint!
Number of posts : 12087 Age : 52 Location : shelbyville Registration date : 2007-06-23
| Subject: Re: once deemed pro stock. Wed Nov 12, 2008 1:51 pm | |
| hmmm im pro and it was my choice, and noone is filling my pockets with cash to be that way therefore I could care less what you think, or how you feel if I was to go back to stock as long as its legal to do within the rules. you guys think to much of yourself ill tell you all that right not to even think for a second how you feel about what i do would really even matter to me. | |
|
| |
Greg McCool Advanced Contributor
Number of posts : 1960 Age : 45 Location : Nashville, TN Registration date : 2007-09-05
| Subject: Re: once deemed pro stock. Wed Nov 12, 2008 2:55 pm | |
| good cuz no one is talking to you fool! | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: once deemed pro stock. | |
| |
|
| |
| once deemed pro stock. | |
|