my thoughts on everything going on

So there are 3 ppl who cheated buy being sponsered in stock class just strip the ppl who cheated from the records and world titles. Next we need to look at the rules there are alot of grey areas in there this would be a great job for abmembers committy to amend the rules and present them to ralph things come u thus out the year that needs to be adressed. Next I say amend the rules for stock and pro seeing how no one pays retail anyway have stock 12v and stock 16v starting in the 09 season and that will
elimate ppl who should be pro tryen to run 12v next thing is if you work for a shop or of u are sponsered how long do you have to wait till u can come back down to stock didnt see any thing in the rules about it I heard 1 and I heard 2 just my thoughts

I agree stock and prostock should only be regulated by voltage. Then the only problem to have is cheater amps. The rule on moving back to stock I have no clue. I've always heard 1 year before you can move back to stock.

ralph can u clear this pro stock question up for us if it is a year is it from the start of a season or stop of a sonsers ship

rd s10 wrote:

So there are 3 ppl who cheated buy being sponsered in stock class just strip the ppl who cheated from the records and world titles. Next we need to look at the rules there are alot of grey areas in there this would be a great job for abmembers committy to amend the rules and present them to ralph things come u thus out the year that needs to be adressed. Next I say amend the rules for stock and pro seeing how no one pays retail anyway have stock 12v and stock 16v starting in the 09 season and that will
elimate ppl who should be pro tryen to run 12v next thing is if you work for a shop or of u are sponsered how long do you have to wait till u can come back down to stock didnt see any thing in the rules about it I heard 1 and I heard 2 just my thoughts

close, but not 100% true....may have been more than that got free equipemnt, and some DID purchase equipment...but we'll wait until the USACi committe meets and decides.

Bring back basic stock....

We will have the same problems with basic stock the only true way is regulate them by votage

Polecat wrote:

rd s10 wrote:

So there are 3 ppl who cheated buy being sponsered in stock class just strip the ppl who cheated from the records and world titles. Next we need to look at the rules there are alot of grey areas in there this would be a great job for abmembers committy to amend the rules and present them to ralph things come u thus out the year that needs to be adressed. Next I say amend the rules for stock and pro seeing how no one pays retail anyway have stock 12v and stock 16v starting in the 09 season and that will
elimate ppl who should be pro tryen to run 12v next thing is if you work for a shop or of u are sponsered how long do you have to wait till u can come back down to stock didnt see any thing in the rules about it I heard 1 and I heard 2 just my thoughts

close, but not 100% true....may have been more than that got free equipemnt, and some DID purchase equipment...but we'll wait until the USACi committe meets and decides.

Is there a USACI committe?

have bstock with the same rules as before but you dont have too move up till you get a championship. have super and pro stock with the same rules exept the voltage diiferance.

TECH114 wrote:

Polecat wrote:

rd s10 wrote:

So there are 3 ppl who cheated buy being sponsered in stock class just strip the ppl who cheated from the records and world titles. Next we need to look at the rules there are alot of grey areas in there this would be a great job for abmembers committy to amend the rules and present them to ralph things come u thus out the year that needs to be adressed. Next I say amend the rules for stock and pro seeing how no one pays retail anyway have stock 12v and stock 16v starting in the 09 season and that will
elimate ppl who should be pro tryen to run 12v next thing is if you work for a shop or of u are sponsered how long do you have to wait till u can come back down to stock didnt see any thing in the rules about it I heard 1 and I heard 2 just my thoughts

close, but not 100% true....may have been more than that got free equipemnt, and some DID purchase equipment...but we'll wait until the USACi committe meets and decides.

Is there a USACI committe?

sorry, Board...

Even if u move up a team will find someone to replace u for someone else who has the same equipment so its like u never moved only way this could work is first year competors who has no afilation withba team but they still will be hard to do

I like b. stock, I dont know why they took it away. They should do it again but limit a few thngs like one battery, panels in, limit power wire,head unit in the dash.etc.

rd s10 wrote:

Even if u move up a team will find someone to replace u for someone else who has the same equipment so its like u never moved only way this could work is first year competors who has no afilation withba team but they still will be hard to do

but how could you verify that the new stock guys, isn't affiliated with the EX team...you really can't....

wanna make it real interesting, nobody in the car to hold the mics....even it out some.

lol oh man tracy i thunk you missed the part where raph stated thats obserd and wont happen


it was quite a few months ago

I am keeping my thoughts to myself. I am working on my van and bringing it strong into the lanes. Time to shut some BIATCHES UP.

sanman wrote:

lol oh man tracy i thunk you missed the part where raph stated thats obserd and wont happen


it was quite a few months ago

maybe so, but anything can, and does happen...all i am saying, would even the playing field out, and stop the "what's he doing in his car" mentality.

U could make that the person has 2 have a prefab box

Yes there is still a Usaci competitor commitee. If you don't know who your rep is let us know. We should really get a sticky with our contact info up here so people know about it and can get ahold of us.

I am on the committee. Who is the head guy? Bruce is not there

This whole issue is in the hands of Rules and Ethics Committee

Yup committee isn't involed in this at all.... Ralph didn't mean to say commitee he meant to say Board ,,,,rules and ethics committee.......


Diddn't want anyone thinking any compeditors had a hand in any decition by the Board..... Thanks and have a WONDERFUL DAY.......

usacise wrote:

This whole issue is in the hands of Rules and Ethics Committee

yep,zackly....