| | sb rule change id think be good |  |
|
+44greatscotts Alan The Spoiler The_Rowlands 8 posters |
| Author | Message |
|---|
The_Rowlands
I own this joint!
Number of posts : 7398
Age : 58
Location : MIDWEST
Registration date : 2007-08-08
|  Subject: sb rule change id think be good  Sun Jul 22, 2012 10:24 am | |
| ive been seeing tons of 2 18 builds out there ....and 2 18s is sb4.....
i really think the 18 and 15 sub points needs to be lower
sb3 is 8-10 thats 80 inches of cone and ya can have only 1 18 or 2 15s
2 18s and 3 15s should fit in sb 3 | |
|
| | |
The Spoiler
Novice Contributor
Number of posts : 154
Age : 53
Location : Katy Texas
Registration date : 2012-05-19
| | Subject: Re: sb rule change id think be good Sun Jul 22, 2012 11:53 am | |
| I totally agree im running 2 18s my self in a 6th order bandpass wall.. | |
|
| | |
Alan
Thats a Lot of Posts!
Number of posts : 3897
Age : 44
Location : Watson Louisiana
Registration date : 2008-02-05
| | Subject: Re: sb rule change id think be good Sun Jul 22, 2012 12:04 pm | |
| Wow how did it take so long for someone to notice lol. Ive never looked into sb classes much
But even 3 15s or 2 18s in less than 8-10s | |
|
| | |
The_Rowlands
I own this joint!
Number of posts : 7398
Age : 58
Location : MIDWEST
Registration date : 2007-08-08
| | Subject: Re: sb rule change id think be good Sun Jul 22, 2012 12:15 pm | |
| lol ... ive always noticed but being in sb 5 no matter what.... didnt really give a shitz ....but hey lets be fair | |
|
| | |
Guest
Guest
| | Subject: Re: sb rule change id think be good Sun Jul 22, 2012 3:46 pm | |
| we noticed when sb was started and asked back then, they said it would be to complicated to simply go by cone area and that the point system would be much better
some of the judges cant even determine the rules they way it is, how are we suppose to expect them to be able to do math tooo?
but anywho, hasnt been revisited since. |
|
| | |
4greatscotts
Newbie
Number of posts : 32
Registration date : 2008-07-13
| | Subject: Re: sb rule change id think be good Tue Jul 24, 2012 1:34 pm | |
| Be good to see it changed. For the most part the motor strength is the same from 10s-18s on the typical sb sub being used. | |
|
| | |
BODEAN
Basic Contributor
Number of posts : 399
Age : 48
Location : West Point, MS
Registration date : 2011-08-21
| | Subject: Re: sb rule change id think be good Tue Jul 24, 2012 9:28 pm | |
| | |
|
| | |
bojangles
Above Average Contributor
Number of posts : 505
Age : 38
Location : Junction City, KS
Registration date : 2009-05-30
| | Subject: Re: sb rule change id think be good Tue Jul 24, 2012 11:33 pm | |
| Sounds like a good idea to me. Also can we lift the battery limit and allow multiple alternators? My amps would appreciate it greatly. | |
|
| | |
poundstone
Advanced Contributor
Number of posts : 1900
Age : 41
Location : decatur, il
Registration date : 2010-06-05
| | Subject: Re: sb rule change id think be good Wed Jul 25, 2012 2:27 am | |
| yeah would love to be able to add a second alt. kinda messed up the burp classes can have unlimited and we get 1.lol | |
|
| | |
basscort11
Above Average Contributor
Number of posts : 554
Age : 36
Location : dallas, texas
Registration date : 2011-01-09
| | Subject: Re: sb rule change id think be good Wed Jul 25, 2012 3:38 pm | |
| i wanted to do SB3 2 years ago when i was SB 154s out the trunk with 1 18. but i looked at the numbers i was up against and said F it. :/ i love 2 18 builds | |
|
| | |
Sponsored content
| | Subject: Re: sb rule change id think be good | |
| |
|
| | |
| | sb rule change id think be good | |
|
Calendar
