need some opinions on some good 0-600 stock amps.
what say you guys.

rd 5

cactus pf600.1/treo 4.1/d5/ab 200.1/mmats 4000.05

audiopipe aqx25001 or the older m3 by digital designs

thanks jeff the ab200.1 was one i was looking at. an the cactus is one i forgot about too. thanks man those are some good suggestions.
what you mean ryan lol? na man its for a fellow team mate of mine he is in stock class an he is now running a stetsom 2kd 2 ohm an its rating at 13v is like 1800 watts.

Be different. Use a Soundstream DTR1.3400. 3400 @ .5 ohm and 2200 @ 1ohm are the only published ratings... according to my math, the rating is 550 @ 4ohm because of the 1ohm rating. I wanna try one to see what it clamps. but I'm too cheap.

BTW, I need you to clamp it and tell us what it does.

untill its proven its not worth the money

i wanna clamp that lil stetsom amp to see what it puts out for him. damn website has like 2 didferet ratings one is 12v an other is 14v an a 2ohm an 4ohm rating.
its loud so far but his box is bigger than what is alloud in stock an now that i have looked at his amp so is it too.
i asked him did he wanna run stock 1801-3000 but damn man those are some loud numbers lmao

thanks daryl lol gotta give ya boi some hell don't ya. well its up to my boi now we are negotiating to see what he wants to run.

run that big ass pyramid the new one.

m3 is nice but not in the league as the others

We tested m3 vs 200.1. M3 was like .5 louder if I remember right. Both amps @ .25 on 2 12v batts and that was the old m3 that did way more power @ 13.8v than 11v

ive done 160.6 on 1 200.1 have you with the m3

now with thjat said i didnt say is was junk i said it was nice, and the main factor that makes me shy away from it is the thermal issues it has wich the 200.1 doesnt have

the m3 also wouldnt come close to the d5/4.1

ive done 160.6 on 1 200.1 have you with the m3

now with thjat said i didnt say is was junk i said it was nice, and the main factor that makes me shy away from it is the thermal issues it has wich the 200.1 doesnt have

the m3 also wouldnt come close to the d5/4.1

thats funny i havent seen an m3 come close to loud and clears 0-600 stock score yet

ive done 160.6 on 1 200.1 have you with the m3

now with thjat said i didnt say is was junk i said it was nice, and the main factor that makes me shy away from it is the thermal issues it has wich the 200.1 doesnt have

the m3 also wouldnt come close to the d5/4.1

that damn jeff knows amps guys, you know you can't argue with him on this, hell even i don't even argue with him on amps cause he knows his Dung Pile............................so buddy am i huggin them good enough for ya man lmao

what about the db drive okur 2000...aint it the newer version of the pd2000? i'd like to try one of those out.

aint the 200.1 if its addictive audio make it 601-1800????

nope 200.1 is 500@4 its also a usaci certified amplifier

now on 12-14.7v the catus pf600.1 is the top dawg amp having been in the loud and clear 0-600 stock crx didnt it do 160.6

and then they went to 16v batts and the 4.1 for 161.8 i think

the d5 wasnt out at that time

Too funny. I just posted a poll on this same topic over at CA.com. The 20.1 is the leader on that board.

http://www.caraudio.com/forum/amplifiers/478149-rank-these-0-600w-amps.html

20.1 isnt in the class of these amps either lol
just to let some people know of the amps i have played with for this class well here goes

cactus pf600.1
rd d5
pd2000
ab 200.1
treo 4.1
mmats 3000.05
ia 20.1
m3


thse are in no particular order at all

the 4.1 to date has the highest 0-600 prostock score, and the pf600.1 has the highest for stock

well if i was running stock i know which amp i would be spending my money on then.

they did it on the cactus batts though wich means you will need to find differant batteries now