| DD m2B official ruling | |
|
+102003f150 chrysler300 BBGIC chrisfish sanman DBsickestkid TAMU poundstone Alan Anton Miller 14 posters |
|
Author | Message |
---|
Anton Miller Novice Contributor
Number of posts : 59 Age : 35 Location : MN Registration date : 2012-11-01
| Subject: DD m2B official ruling Sun Nov 11, 2012 4:40 pm | |
| can some one give me the official rulling on what the dd m2b rating is for 4 ohm? site says 1700 @ 1 ohm, dealer of mine says 2300 @ 1 ohm
just wanna know. | |
|
| |
Alan Thats a Lot of Posts!
Number of posts : 3897 Age : 44 Location : Watson Louisiana Registration date : 2008-02-05
| Subject: Re: DD m2B official ruling Sun Nov 11, 2012 5:53 pm | |
| Whats it say on paper and the website ? | |
|
| |
poundstone Advanced Contributor
Number of posts : 1900 Age : 41 Location : decatur, il Registration date : 2010-06-05
| Subject: Re: DD m2B official ruling Sun Nov 11, 2012 7:10 pm | |
| stupic computer double post
Last edited by poundstone on Sun Nov 11, 2012 7:12 pm; edited 1 time in total | |
|
| |
poundstone Advanced Contributor
Number of posts : 1900 Age : 41 Location : decatur, il Registration date : 2010-06-05
| Subject: Re: DD m2B official ruling Sun Nov 11, 2012 7:12 pm | |
| it says 2 diff things alan so they take the highest published rating which is 2300 man! only reason website dont say it now is because a ton of meca competitors called and bitched about it because it kicked them out of their classes so they took it off but was too late already went out as rated power they would need to send 1 in to get it tested to get it requalified! ask meca competitors man my buddy brian stice had to sell his m1c and buy a m1b because the rating on it is not published so it goes off what teh book says which is like 1200 for his amp | |
|
| |
Alan Thats a Lot of Posts!
Number of posts : 3897 Age : 44 Location : Watson Louisiana Registration date : 2008-02-05
| Subject: Re: DD m2B official ruling Mon Nov 12, 2012 1:49 pm | |
| Manufacturer rating based classes ftw | |
|
| |
TAMU Advanced Contributor
Number of posts : 1548 Location : TEXAS Registration date : 2007-06-23
| Subject: Re: DD m2B official ruling Mon Nov 12, 2012 5:44 pm | |
| go ahead let him run it in 0-600 lol. | |
|
| |
DBsickestkid Novice Contributor
Number of posts : 189 Age : 34 Location : pasadena, yx Registration date : 2011-11-08
| Subject: Re: DD m2B official ruling Tue Nov 13, 2012 2:41 am | |
| | |
|
| |
Anton Miller Novice Contributor
Number of posts : 59 Age : 35 Location : MN Registration date : 2012-11-01
| Subject: Re: DD m2B official ruling Tue Nov 13, 2012 10:14 am | |
| im trying to run 2 in 0-1000 | |
|
| |
sanman I own this joint!
Number of posts : 12087 Age : 52 Location : shelbyville Registration date : 2007-06-23
| Subject: Re: DD m2B official ruling Tue Nov 13, 2012 1:06 pm | |
| Dung Pile CAN I RUN 2 D9'S IN 0-1000 | |
|
| |
Anton Miller Novice Contributor
Number of posts : 59 Age : 35 Location : MN Registration date : 2012-11-01
| Subject: Re: DD m2B official ruling Tue Nov 13, 2012 1:15 pm | |
| Good to know I can get good awnsers on here... | |
|
| |
chrisfish I own this joint!
Number of posts : 6521 Age : 54 Location : Silt Colorado Registration date : 2009-05-16
| Subject: Re: DD m2B official ruling Tue Nov 13, 2012 1:43 pm | |
| I thought everything was said? Highest published rating=2300 ÷4 =575 only one amp in 0-1000 | |
|
| |
Anton Miller Novice Contributor
Number of posts : 59 Age : 35 Location : MN Registration date : 2012-11-01
| Subject: Re: DD m2B official ruling Tue Nov 13, 2012 1:45 pm | |
| Its only published on the dealers sheets tho. But OK. Will find different amps. | |
|
| |
chrisfish I own this joint!
Number of posts : 6521 Age : 54 Location : Silt Colorado Registration date : 2009-05-16
| Subject: Re: DD m2B official ruling Tue Nov 13, 2012 1:49 pm | |
| I have no doubt it would pass if someone sent one in for testing | |
|
| |
sanman I own this joint!
Number of posts : 12087 Age : 52 Location : shelbyville Registration date : 2007-06-23
| Subject: Re: DD m2B official ruling Tue Nov 13, 2012 2:14 pm | |
| anton only wants to hear what anton wants to hear
its the old theory that if you ask enough times it might change lol | |
|
| |
BBGIC Big Bald Guy in Charge
Number of posts : 2358 Age : 57 Location : World Wide - 11 Countries Registration date : 2007-06-22
| Subject: Re: DD m2B official ruling Tue Nov 13, 2012 2:29 pm | |
| Unless it is protested we take the highest manufacturer rating at any ohm and extrapolate the 4 ohm rating to get the finals results.
| |
|
| |
Anton Miller Novice Contributor
Number of posts : 59 Age : 35 Location : MN Registration date : 2012-11-01
| Subject: Re: DD m2B official ruling Tue Nov 13, 2012 2:42 pm | |
| so no matter what if it says a number some where doesnt matter where as long as its from the manufacturer thats what you take?
im trying to figure it out. | |
|
| |
BBGIC Big Bald Guy in Charge
Number of posts : 2358 Age : 57 Location : World Wide - 11 Countries Registration date : 2007-06-22
| Subject: Re: DD m2B official ruling Tue Nov 13, 2012 2:57 pm | |
| Spoke to DD today. At 14.4 they rated it at 2400 watts 1 ohm but...
Per the company it actually produces 810 watts @ 4 ohm RMS - 14.4volts.
810 would be the USACI Rating...
Thank you goes out to DD for being up front and helping avoid controversy. Good show!
That is per the manufacturer directly about 3 minutes ago VIA telephone...
Last edited by BBGIC on Wed Nov 14, 2012 6:29 pm; edited 1 time in total | |
|
| |
sanman I own this joint!
Number of posts : 12087 Age : 52 Location : shelbyville Registration date : 2007-06-23
| Subject: Re: DD m2B official ruling Tue Nov 13, 2012 3:08 pm | |
| and bam bam bam there it is sorry man its like this sometimes in fact i have fell victim to it alot lol | |
|
| |
Anton Miller Novice Contributor
Number of posts : 59 Age : 35 Location : MN Registration date : 2012-11-01
| Subject: Re: DD m2B official ruling Tue Nov 13, 2012 3:21 pm | |
| thank you just get confused on the "published rating" part of it. | |
|
| |
chrisfish I own this joint!
Number of posts : 6521 Age : 54 Location : Silt Colorado Registration date : 2009-05-16
| |
| |
BBGIC Big Bald Guy in Charge
Number of posts : 2358 Age : 57 Location : World Wide - 11 Countries Registration date : 2007-06-22
| |
| |
sanman I own this joint!
Number of posts : 12087 Age : 52 Location : shelbyville Registration date : 2007-06-23
| Subject: Re: DD m2B official ruling Tue Nov 13, 2012 5:07 pm | |
| exactly since the company rates it at 810@4 thats the rating it gets
FISHY BOIIIIIIIIIIIIII LOL | |
|
| |
chrisfish I own this joint!
Number of posts : 6521 Age : 54 Location : Silt Colorado Registration date : 2009-05-16
| Subject: Re: DD m2B official ruling Tue Nov 13, 2012 6:13 pm | |
| I know...but i will be sitting at the registration table trying to put people in the proper class. Explaining how we come up with the 4 ohm rating . And well... maybe we should have a sheet of paper to go off instead.? Lol | |
|
| |
chrysler300 Novice Contributor
Number of posts : 78 Age : 46 Location : San Antonio, Tx. Registration date : 2012-03-10
| Subject: Re: DD m2B official ruling Tue Nov 13, 2012 6:23 pm | |
| You could always run d5s.... Lol | |
|
| |
sanman I own this joint!
Number of posts : 12087 Age : 52 Location : shelbyville Registration date : 2007-06-23
| Subject: Re: DD m2B official ruling Tue Nov 13, 2012 7:02 pm | |
| DD could have also rated these amps at 600@4 but they chose not to | |
|
| |
2003f150 Thats a Lot of Posts!
Number of posts : 2610 Age : 41 Location : Biloxi,MS Registration date : 2007-09-12
| Subject: Re: DD m2B official ruling Wed Nov 14, 2012 11:57 am | |
| LOL this is so dumb.....a m3a which does way more power than a m2b is 600 @ 4 but a m2b is 810 LMAO......it just gets better and better! | |
|
| |
taz Above Average Contributor
Number of posts : 797 Age : 58 Location : iowa Registration date : 2007-06-29
| Subject: Re: DD m2B official ruling Wed Nov 14, 2012 1:31 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
sanman I own this joint!
Number of posts : 12087 Age : 52 Location : shelbyville Registration date : 2007-06-23
| Subject: Re: DD m2B official ruling Wed Nov 14, 2012 2:50 pm | |
| YOU GOT AN ATTITUDE ABOUT THIS THEN CALL DD THEY ARE THE ONE RATING THERE Dung Pile | |
|
| |
taz Above Average Contributor
Number of posts : 797 Age : 58 Location : iowa Registration date : 2007-06-29
| Subject: Re: DD m2B official ruling Wed Nov 14, 2012 3:01 pm | |
| ding ... ding ... ding exactly , ralph called them directly so thats what he has to go by... | |
|
| |
solo1 Basic Contributor
Number of posts : 428 Registration date : 2007-06-22
| Subject: Re: DD m2B official ruling Wed Nov 14, 2012 6:05 pm | |
| - sanman wrote:
- DD could have also rated these amps at 600@4 but they chose not to
Why should companies under rate or make a specific rating for their amplifiers just to cater to Usaci. It should be the other way around Usaci should cater to the manufacturers. I know its crazy right,its almost as if they dont care if their amps are rated to be "usaci friendly" or not. | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: DD m2B official ruling | |
| |
|
| |
| DD m2B official ruling | |
|