Canaan Novice Contributor


Joined : 03 Jul 2007 Posts : 110
| Subject: Protests and 'hot' amps... Fri May 16, 2008 10:15 am | |
| Some may look at this as just stirring shit, but I feel it is a legit question.
So, we all know that even in a single production run of amps...some will be stronger than others. That said, here is my question:
Does USACi test only 1 amp when an amp model is protested? (I don't know, I just had to ask)
I have seen the same model amp range from 105-135% of rated power. Hell I have an MTX TA7801 birth sheet right here that claims 1779w at 1ohm when its rated at 1200w. The 4ohm rating on this amp is 400w, but the sheet claims 760w. I don't know the criteria by with MTX tests their amps, but they are CEA2006 compliant.
Clearly this amp wouldn't even get close to passing a protest (not that is amp would be the loudest in USACi or anything). But at the same time, I have seen birthsheets saying on other 7801's in the 1400-1500w range. This is just a hot amp.
Who is to say that in the past USACi didn't get ahold of a hot amp and rerated a boarder line model based on that?
Does anyone else feel that USACi should test more than 1 amp from a given model in order for a protest to stick? Not just the M3, but any amp under protest.
Sorry if this is just stirring the pot alil more, but I just had to ask. If I am way off on the way I'm looking at it, please feel free to chime in.
EDIT: Also, I would love to see all amps certified, but just how long would that take? And think about the cost.
I run 20.1's...would they pass w/ the new 20% criteria? |
|
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Protests and 'hot' amps... Fri May 16, 2008 10:55 am | |
| | IMHO, i dont think any amp out there would pass at this, as all amps use the division to get the 4 ohm ratting, and not one of them is 100% efficient so to say thats all they make at 4ohm is impossible. |
|
zacdavis Advanced Contributor


Age : 31 Joined : 28 Jun 2007 Posts : 399
| Subject: Re: Protests and 'hot' amps... Fri May 16, 2008 8:34 pm | |
| Thats a very good point canaan.
As Bruce stated, we think the whole division thing is kinda bogus anyhow. We've been tossing around a few ideas many of you should like. After our next committee meeting we'll post a new thread on the subject. Thanks for the input Canaan, you've given us something else to throw in the mix. _________________ Pro Stock Champ/Record Holder Upper midwest region Competitor Committee call Zac at 608-365-3500 or Mike at 262-707-7570 www.myspace.com/daviszac www.myspace.com/salvame www.tinkertoycustoms.com under construction |
|
sanman I have no life


Age : 36 Joined : 23 Jun 2007 Posts : 3176
| Subject: Re: Protests and 'hot' amps... Fri May 16, 2008 8:46 pm | |
| PROBLEM WITH TESTING MORE THAN 1 AMP OF A CERTAIN BRAND IS GETTING THEM SENT IN TO TEST NOW HOW MANY COMPETITORS WOULD DO IT JUST TO HAVE IT TESTED WITHOUT THE FEAR OF GETTING IT BACK TO GET THERE POINTS, OR TAKING A CHANCE OF IT BEING SCREWED UP????
MAYBE AN AUTO INVITE TO FINALS FOR THOSE THAT DO SEND THERES IN TO BE TESTED MAYBE.
i LIKE MY IDEA TO RALPH NOT TO LONG AGO A WAY TO TES THE AMP AT FINALS OUT THE CAR ON THE BENCH THEN BACK TO THE CAR THIS IS WHAT IDE LOVE TO SEE _________________ TEAM HARD HITTERS SWAT ITS ON NOW BABABABABAY TEAM TALKALOTTOSH@t TEAM POWER MASTER TEAM REVOLUTION[/u][/b] 2008 1801-3K PRO GOAL 164(GOAL MET) 2007 0-600 PROSTOCK WORLD CHAMPION 159.6 2006 0-1000 PRO 159.7 2ND 2005 301-900SS 156.4 3RD 2004 301-900SS WORLD CHAMPION 158.8 2003 151-300 STOCK 2ND PLACE 156.2[b] |
|
PhatSam Pro Contributor


Age : 27 Joined : 24 Jun 2007 Posts : 613 : Topeka,Ks
| Subject: Re: Protests and 'hot' amps... Fri May 16, 2008 9:20 pm | |
| I'd be willin to send in my amp. But in my defense I have a team mate close that I can borrow from til its back. Only thing that scares me is if they blew it while testing.
Only thing I would say that limits your idea of a bench at finals would be the cost to get a half ass accurate one. BUt I think it is a acceptable idea _________________ Sam Schattilly Team Treo Team Broken Silence Team DB Driven |
|